24 October 2009

T cells and immunosuppression after organ transplantation

In the 7630 course transplantation unit, it has been mentioned that graft rejection is majorly a T cell unintentional wrongdoing and immunosuppression regimen should be able to take care of that. What comes to be a little surprising is dating from mid 50's uptill now, though we have learned the mechanism of how rejection happens but we still don't have a surefire way of saying right away what kind of success we will have with a given transplantation. Reason to that is the transplantation success more relies on post procedure patient monitoring and the right cocktail of immunosuppressive drugs (least toxic but effective) tailored for an individual with multiple given physical conditions. Post-transplantation, for some time the focus is on the transplanted organ, its health and how its coping with the host body, but later on the long term overall patient survival becomes the critical point. Why? because with organ transplantation, its not only the transplanted organ, but the all of host's body at stake. The major reason to this is the inherent toxicity that long term immunosuppressive drug regimen ultimately manifests. I believe the holy grail in organ-transplantation is to find better biomarkers which give the patient's state of the system picture accurately, timely, preferably non-invasively and the immunosuppression, such that its localized, does what its supposed to and nothing else. Of course if in future we are able to make organs in-vitro that are made with patient's own cells, then we don't have to worry about immunosuppression (ref: tissue/organ skeleton re-population by stem cells and "chromosome 6" by Robin cook). But for now, ideal long term immunosuppression may be the biggest challenge in transplantation and that's where T-cells come in picture.

Standard immunosuppression therapy has two phases, the more aggressive, "stand down or I WILL shoot" approach during the initial post-transplantation period. It is to prevent acute rejection episode with cocktail of multiple drugs targeting multiple aspects of host immune system. Then later on, as the patient and the graft stabilize a bit, a subdued but still effective dosing of choice immunosuppressants specifically targeting T-cells, is administered such that toxicity is minimal. Before describing more on T-cells, immunosuppression mechanism and resultant toxicity, a short description of different immunosuppressive drug classes is in order. These are mainly glucocorticoids, anti inflammatory drugs, antimetabolites, antibodies and lymphocyte cell-proliferation inhibitors via interaction with immunophilins. Glucocorticoids are administered generally in the first phase and suppress cell mediated immunity (pro-inflammatory genes of interleukins and TNF ). Anti inflammatory properties of a drug suppress the attraction of immune system components to a site of inflammation / injury. This means less epithelial adhesion, emigration, chemotaxis, phagocytosis, metabolic acceleration and release of inflammatory mediators. Antimetabolites and cytostatics are targeted to suppress cell division specifically that of T and B cells. For example purine and pyramidine analogs stunt the DNA replication process thereby inhibiting cell division. Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies are directed towards T and B lymphocytes, some cause lysis of these cells by complement and others cause opsonization, some target receptors such as IL-2 and CD-3 to prevent interaction and activation. As you can imagine these drugs can be given in combinations minding the patient specific and sound just wonderful for the treatment. However none of these drugs are without serious adverse impacts if not given correctly. The same goes for immunosuppressants which kick in the first phase of the therapy and stay on for the long term suppression. I am indicating towards drugs that interact with immunophilins to inhibit T cell proliferation. This is the drug class that is T cell specific and has major implications in long term immunosuppression drug regimen and drug toxicity due to lengthy exposure.

I shall further delve into the last drug class, their partial pharmacodynamics, T-cell behavior under these drugs and as an example nephrotoxicity vs chronic rejection in my next post. I hope you found this post useful.

Thanks !
- Rahul

5 comments:

  1. What field are you in Rahul? Looking forward to the next post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the very interesting post. You said that the "holy grail in organ transplantation" is to find better biomarkers that could be used to suppress the immune system locally. With the immune system being so complicated, do you think we will someday be able to perform local immunesuppression? It would be very difficult to isolate the organ after transplantation, since cytokines and chemokines are capable of recruiting cells from all over the body. I'm also not sure what you were thinking when you mentioned biomarkers. Can you give us and idea or what your ideal biomarker would allow you to detect?

    ReplyDelete
  3. How long can a person expect to have their transplant last with the correct amount and correct type of drugs? I believe success is also based on diet and other factors as well?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you very much Holly, Amy and Tanya for reading my post. I am no expert but I shall try to answer the questions as best to my knowledge. I am working in dept of Anesthesiology as a PhD student and my feild is to find biochemical mechanism of immunosuppressant toxicity as well as find novel biomarkers that detect kidney injury early on. Holly: I am sorry for the confusion but when I mentioned biomarkers I meant for example in kidney transplantation, after the procedure when on long term immunosuppression there is kidney injury (either due to drug nephrotoxicity or chronic rejection caused by insufficient immunosuppression)the current marker used in clinic fail to detect it until aproximately more than 50% damage to the organ is done much of which can be irreversible. If we catch the injury early on as its happening we can modulate immunosuppressant dosage accordingly. we can increase the dose if there is less immunosuppression causing chronic rejection and decrease the dosage if there is immunosuppression drug toxicity. Unfortunately in clinic right now, first the detection is late second due to similar injury manifestation by both chronic rejection and drug nephrotoxicity, there isn't yet a measure to find out which one of them is causing the injury, where detection means totally different preventive measure as I mentioned earlier. So to find biomarkers that can detect organ injury early on post transplantation is one of the things that can change the graft and patient survival rates. An ideal biomarker should be non-invasive (lets say from urine / blood. Invasive would be a tissue biopsy), it should be inherently involved in the biochemical pathways that reasult in the disease symptom so that if there is a slight change in the state of the disease we are readily able to detect it via change in concentration/state of this biomarker. Considering kidney transplanation, some biomolecule in urine will be an ideal candidate because it will be intimately associated with the kidney (because organ in question produces the biomarker directly). Today creatinine in blood and urine (along with tissue biopsy and histology to see damage)is used as a gold standard in transplantation related kidney injury, but even for kidney injury it has shown be quite insensitive. Addressing local immunosuppression, yes it seems almost sci-fi to think about something like that given the complexity and exposure to everything in the body, but it may not be as far fetched. Though I have very limited knowledge about this but I have heard of some very interesting theories people are working on but it may be too priliminary to mention it here. our best bet is still a system-wide efficient and non toxic immunosuppression along with very sensitive biomarkers to detect any adverse effects. Tanya: Yes the success is based on tons of factors because anything in body is everything and anything is connected to everything. for example if there is a liver transplant and popular immunosuppressants are in effect then there are very high chances there will be kidney specific injury. if kidney is injured it wont be able to do its various jobs (filtering, BP etc.) and we will have system wide effects where it will be hard to pinpoint what caused it. While there maybe no such thing as ideal immunosuppression (because we are doing something that nature did not intend upon happening) with very diligent patient monitoring with current day immunosuppressants (please don't quote me on this), in cases people have lived with their kidney grafts for as long as 20-25 years. Majority of kidney transplants see anywhere from 10-14 years until they need a retransplant.

    I hope this answers some of the queries and I thank you all for showing interest. Please feel free to post any other questions.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for sharing some good stuff here, I want to share a testimony on how Dr Itua herbal medicine cured my prostate cancer completely with no side effects.
    Dr Itua herbal medicine can cure all sort of diseases and chronic illness, you can contact dr itua by email or visit his website to get your own herbal healing,
    Email: drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com
    Web: www.drituaherbalcenter.com

    ReplyDelete