Though fewer than 50 cases of aquagenic urticaria have been documented in medical journals, relatively recent online tabloids and blogs have written articles about the condition (2,3). The clinical features of the condition include small perifollicular wheels on any skin region after contact with water (distilled, tap, or saline). For some patients characteristics of the water effected the condition, salinity, pH, and others factors (4,5). Many patients suffering from aquagenic urticaria have also been diagnosed with cholinergic urticaria or dermographism (6,7).
From the known mechanism of the immune system we have learned about this year it seems unlikely that water itself could be recognized by the immune system. However, a few hypothesis for the mechanism of the condition have been proposed. It is possible that the water acts to carry an antigen (possibly sebum) through from the epidermis to the dermis where it is recognized by mast cells causing the localized reaction (8). Further studies with this hypothesis demonstrated that organic solvents increased sensitivity to the reaction, and removal of the stratum corneum layer of the skin produced similar results. Another theory suggested cholinergic activation resulted in the reaction, scopolamine was shown to decrease reactions in two patients, but pre-treatment with atropine did not suppress reactions. The injection of methacholine, which usually elucidates cholinergic reactions for diagnostics was negative when tested on aquagenic urticaria patients (9). It may also be possible that the activation or involvement of the sensory neurons, perhaps presenting antigens from a latent virus could provide a possible mechanism, though no research has been done in this vein. Similarly, it is possible that ions in the water change an already present molecule of self into a recognizable antigen.
Elucidating a mechanism, or further understanding of aquagenic urticaria and other types of physical urticaria may provide immunologists new insights into antigen presentation, and inflammation.
1. Kontou-Fili, K, Borici-Mazi, R, Kapp, A, et al. Physical urticaria: classification and diagnostic guidelines. An EAACI position paper. Allergy 1997; 52:504.
2. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-520329/The-teenage-girl-allergic-WATER.html
3. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/AllergiesNews/story?id=7401149&page=2
4. Gallo, R, Cacciapuoti, M, Cozzani, E, Guarrera, M. Localized aquagenic urticaria dependent on saline concentration. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44:110
5. Tkach, JR. Aquagenic urticaria. Cutis 1981; 28:454
6. Parker RK, Crowe MJ, Guin JD. Aquagenic urticaria. Cutis. 1992 Oct;50(4):283-4
7. Luong KV; Nguyen LT. Aquagenic urticaria: report of a case and review of the literature. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998 Jun;80(6):483-5.
8. SHELLEY, WB, RAWNSLEY, HM. AQUAGENIC URTICARIA. CONTACT SENSITIVITY REACTION TO WATER. JAMA 1964; 189:895
9. utdol.com
30 November 2009
Aquagenic Urticaria (Physical Urticarias)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
While the speculation on whether or not water or chlorine could be antigenic in a person is interesting, I do need to point out that dailymail.co.uk is a tabloid, and you have to take anything you see there with a very large grain of salt.
ReplyDeleteAs to whether or not she's allergic to water... I would highly doubt that since she is herself over 60% water... Plus I feel like the principle is the same for water that it would be for some hormones. For the most part, you can't make an antibody against an organic compound. Water is even smaller than a hormone, and wouldn't be able to be presented on an APC.
My money would be that she's hypersensitive to chlorine or something else in the water rather than to the water itself. Rash could also be an indication of mild chemical burns. (I think... if a clinician could comment on this I'd appreciate it.) So maybe not an allergy to water, but a reaction to something in the water.
The second link is a dermatology blog (though I don't think it is necessarily more valid than the tabliod). I went back and performed a couple more searches:
ReplyDeletehttp://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1049978-overview
Type it into pubmed,there are a couple of legitimate dermatology papers about it.
Luong KV, Nguyen LT: Aquatic urticaria: report of a case and review of the literature. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998; 80: 483-485
Pitarch G., et. al.: Familial Aquagenic Urticaria and Bernard-Soulier Syndrome: Dermatology 2006;212; 96-97
One of the earlier papers discusses a mechanism whereby the water acts to move components of the epidermis into the dermis, causing mast cell recognition.
Aquagenic urticaria is a known physical urticaria. Up To Date Online (utdol.com) has a nice summary of physical urticaria including aquagenic. It should be accessible through the University Health Sciences Library on campus.
ReplyDeleteThank you! I did not know this condition existed. I will go back and rewrite my initial entry as a review and take a look at the observations and mechanistic hypotheses.
ReplyDelete